Skip to content

CASE STUDY

Product Codebase AI Prototyping Platform

An AI-Prototyping workflow that turns real product data, components, and codebase into high-fidelity AI-generated prototypes.

Hero Image

Problem Solved

The traditional process introduced a lot of distance between a product idea and something people could actually interact with.

A requirement would arrive as a ticket, specification, or user story. From there, the designer had to translate that information into screens, reconstruct missing product context, determine which components and patterns applied, and manually assemble the experience in Sketch. Only after all of that work could the team begin evaluating whether the proposed solution actually worked.

Much of this effort was necessary to prepare a design rather than to design it.

The biggest opportunity was therefore not replacing designers or automating creative decisions. It was removing the repetitive translation work that sits between a requirement and a testable experience.

The new approach aimed to shorten that gap while keeping designers firmly in control. AI could handle context gathering, initial construction, and repetitive implementation, while designers remained responsible for interaction decisions, prioritization, edge cases, usability, and overall product quality.

Case Study Icon

Problem Solved

The traditional process introduced a lot of distance between a product idea and something people could actually interact with.

A requirement would arrive as a ticket, specification, or user story. From there, the designer had to translate that information into screens, reconstruct missing product context, determine which components and patterns applied, and manually assemble the experience in Sketch. Only after all of that work could the team begin evaluating whether the proposed solution actually worked.

Much of this effort was necessary to prepare a design rather than to design it.

The biggest opportunity was therefore not replacing designers or automating creative decisions. It was removing the repetitive translation work that sits between a requirement and a testable experience.

The new approach aimed to shorten that gap while keeping designers firmly in control. AI could handle context gathering, initial construction, and repetitive implementation, while designers remained responsible for interaction decisions, prioritization, edge cases, usability, and overall product quality.

Problem Solving Approach

The workflow was built around a simple principle: the prototype should be generated from the product itself, not recreated from a description of the product.

Instead of asking AI to invent an interface from a blank canvas, it was given access to the same ecosystem designers and engineers already use:
– The application codebase for domain and product context
– The coded design system for components and interaction patterns
– The design environment for visual and structural guidance
– The issue tracker for requirements and acceptance criteria
– A structured knowledge layer containing reusable design rules

This allowed AI to work with current product knowledge rather than relying on fragmented documentation or manually supplied context.

The team also turned design expertise into reusable system knowledge. Component rules, layout conventions, interaction behaviors, and UX-writing principles were documented in a format AI could consistently interpret. This reduced reliance on tribal knowledge and created a repeatable baseline for generated work. At the same time, the workflow introduced technical guardrails. Prototypes were created in isolated branches and restricted to the presentation layer, keeping experimentation separate from production behavior. Before review, each experience was run in a real browser and checked across the states and conditions that matter in practice.

The result was not intended to be production code. It was a working design artifact: interactive enough to evaluate, realistic enough to communicate the intended experience, and isolated enough to experiment safely.

Case Study Icon

Problem Solving Approach

The workflow was built around a simple principle: the prototype should be generated from the product itself, not recreated from a description of the product.

Instead of asking AI to invent an interface from a blank canvas, it was given access to the same ecosystem designers and engineers already use:
– The application codebase for domain and product context
– The coded design system for components and interaction patterns
– The design environment for visual and structural guidance
– The issue tracker for requirements and acceptance criteria
– A structured knowledge layer containing reusable design rules

This allowed AI to work with current product knowledge rather than relying on fragmented documentation or manually supplied context.

The team also turned design expertise into reusable system knowledge. Component rules, layout conventions, interaction behaviors, and UX-writing principles were documented in a format AI could consistently interpret. This reduced reliance on tribal knowledge and created a repeatable baseline for generated work. At the same time, the workflow introduced technical guardrails. Prototypes were created in isolated branches and restricted to the presentation layer, keeping experimentation separate from production behavior. Before review, each experience was run in a real browser and checked across the states and conditions that matter in practice.

The result was not intended to be production code. It was a working design artifact: interactive enough to evaluate, realistic enough to communicate the intended experience, and isolated enough to experiment safely.

Outcome

The process shifted prototyping from a predominantly manual production task into a faster, iterative activity. Rather than spending most of the initial effort reconstructing screens, designers could move much sooner into reviewing behavior, testing assumptions, and making product decisions. Stakeholders could interact with a realistic experience instead of interpreting static screens, while engineers could review the implementation in the context of the actual application.

Icon
true50

Faster route from requirement to reviewable prototype

true60

Less designer setup effort per request

false

20+ feature concepts prototyped through the workflow

true74

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur. Accumsan eget enim ac pharetra vitae amet sed in.. Tempor id rhoncus vitae sed quisque enim.. Egestas morbi ipsum etiam feugiat. At non a non enim gravida proin eget dui tellus.

Outcome

The process shifted prototyping from a predominantly manual production task into a faster, iterative activity. Rather than spending most of the initial effort reconstructing screens, designers could move much sooner into reviewing behavior, testing assumptions, and making product decisions. Stakeholders could interact with a realistic experience instead of interpreting static screens, while engineers could review the implementation in the context of the actual application.

50%

Faster route from requirement to reviewable prototype

60%

Less designer setup effort per request

20+ feature concepts prototyped through the workflow

Key Features Implemented

Case Study Icon

AI-generated product experiences

Written requirements can be translated into interactive interfaces using existing application patterns, real product context, and established UI components.

Encoded design intelligence

Design-system rules, interaction conventions, layout principles, and UX-writing guidance are maintained as reusable machine-readable knowledge, allowing AI to apply them consistently.

Shared coded design foundation

The component library serves as common infrastructure for design, engineering, and AI. A preconfigured application shell provides the environment needed to turn generated concepts into functioning browser experiences.

Safe experimentation through isolation

Each prototype starts from the latest main branch and remains isolated from production logic and shared application state. This makes rapid exploration possible without introducing unnecessary implementation risk.

Real-browser validation

Prototypes are evaluated where users would actually experience them. Designers can verify interaction behavior, responsive layouts, loading states, empty states, errors, and dark mode before presenting the work.

Design quality checks

Compliance with established design standards is incorporated into the workflow, reducing repetitive manual checks and making quality expectations more systematic.

Living prototypes within the product stack

Because the experience is created within the same front-end ecosystem as the product, it can remain useful beyond the initial design exercise and provide a stronger bridge into eventual implementation.

Key Features Implemented

AI-generated product experiences

Written requirements can be translated into interactive interfaces using existing application patterns, real product context, and established UI components.

Encoded design intelligence

Design-system rules, interaction conventions, layout principles, and UX-writing guidance are maintained as reusable machine-readable knowledge, allowing AI to apply them consistently.

Shared coded design foundation

The component library serves as common infrastructure for design, engineering, and AI. A preconfigured application shell provides the environment needed to turn generated concepts into functioning browser experiences.

Safe experimentation through isolation

Each prototype starts from the latest main branch and remains isolated from production logic and shared application state. This makes rapid exploration possible without introducing unnecessary implementation risk.

Real-browser validation

Prototypes are evaluated where users would actually experience them. Designers can verify interaction behavior, responsive layouts, loading states, empty states, errors, and dark mode before presenting the work.

Design quality checks

Compliance with established design standards is incorporated into the workflow, reducing repetitive manual checks and making quality expectations more systematic.

Living prototypes within the product stack

Because the experience is created within the same front-end ecosystem as the product, it can remain useful beyond the initial design exercise and provide a stronger bridge into eventual implementation.

Technologies

Case Study Icon

Development

Design

Technology Image
Technology Image
Technology Image
Technology Image
Technology Image
Technology Image
Technology Image
Technology Image
Technology Image

Technologies

Development

React
React
Typescript
Typescript

Design

Sketch
Sketch
Claude
Claude
AntDesign
AntDesign
BlueprintUI
BlueprintUI

Project Timeline and Team Structure

The six-month engagement was led by an Atlantbh UX/UI design team, with engineering support provided as needed throughout the project.

Case Study Icon
0%

January 2026

Project start

100%

2026

Ongoing

Position Icon

UX/UI Designers

0

Project Timeline and Team Structure

The six-month engagement was led by an Atlantbh UX/UI design team, with engineering support provided as needed throughout the project.

Project start
January 2026
Ongoing
2026
Position Icon

UX/UI Designers

Methodology

Agile/Scrum with continuous, AI-assisted prototyping and validation.

Case Study Icon

Methodology

Agile/Scrum with continuous, AI-assisted prototyping and validation.

Related case studies

Gain hands-on insights from our team's expertise.

Insurance Documentation Management Platform

Unified platform for structured documentation, task tracking, and process visibility that improved operational efficiency, reduced compliance risks, and strengthened cross-team collaboration.

Insurance

DevOps

MVP Design

Product Design

QA

Software Development

Proactive Trend Analysis & Delivery Automation

Developed automated trend analysis and data tracking to monitor vendor data changes, enabling proactive insights and protecting data quality.

NDA

Data Engineering

Product Design

Ready to Achieve More?

We’ll help you reach your goals quickly with an easy and straightforward process to kick off our collaboration. Here’s what happens next.

STEP 1

Discovery Call

Let’s chat to understand your company, project needs, and answer any questions along the way.

STEP 2

Free Consultation

Work closely with our experts to explore the right solutions for your business.

STEP 3

Collaboration Proposal

We'll recommend the best strategy for your goals, ensuring you get the most from our expertise.

STEP 4

30-Day Cancellation
Policy Contract

Spoiler: It’s Never Been Used

Enjoy peace of mind while we deliver excellence from day one—our track record speaks for itself.

Services you're interested in (Optional)